Samsung Releases PM863 & SM863 Enterprise SATA SSDs: Up to 3.84TB with 3D V-NANDby Kristian Vättö on July 20, 2015 4:35 PM EST
At CES, Samsung displayed a variety of new SSD solutions, including PM863 and SM863, the company's new SATA 6Gbps enterprise drives. At the time Samsung was only sampling its key OEM customers, but with today's announcement Samsung is making the drives available through its retail channel in early August.
The PM863 and SM863 are based on Samsung's in-house "Mercury" controller, but unfortunately I don't have any additional details on the controller architecture itself. I'm guessing it's a derivative of the client-grade controllers utilizing ARM Cortex R4, but I'll have to wait for Samsung's reply before I know for sure.
|Samsung PM863 Specifications|
|NAND||Samsung 32-layer 128Gbit TLC V-NAND|
|4KB Random Read||86K IOPS||99K IOPS||99K IOPS||99K IOPS||99K IOPS||99K IOPS|
|4KB Random Write||5K IOPS||10K IOPS||17K IOPS||18K IOPS||18K IOPS||18K IOPS|
The PM863 is the successor to Samsung's 845DC EVO line and makes the switch to more durable and performant 3D V-NAND. As you will find out in our Micron M510DC review tomorrow, the 845DC is actually a very good and consistent drive despite using TLC NAND, so I'm very intrigued to see how Samsung has been able to improve performance with V-NAND. At least random write performance sees a good 40-50% upgrade and the endurance is now ~1.3 drive writes per day, whereas the 845DC EVO offered only 0.35 DWPD.
In addition to V-NAND, the other major upgrade in the PM863 is the addition of 1.92TB and 3.84TB capacities. Higher capacities allow for further cost savings by reducing the number of racks needed to achieve a specific capacity and in terms of drive prices alone the higher capacities offer more competitive cost per gigabyte. 4TB-class SSD itself isn't record breaking as SanDisk has been selling its Optimus Max for quite some time already, but the PM863 is a 2.5" 7mm product built on a single PCB, whereas SanDisk's is 15mm thick and needs multiple PCBs, giving Samsung a substantial cost advantage.
|Samsung SM863 Specifications|
|NAND||Samsung 32-layer MLC V-NAND|
|4KB Random Read||97K IOPS||97K IOPS||97K IOPS||97K IOPS||97K IOPS|
|4KB Random Write||12K IOPS||20K IOPS||26K IOPS||28K IOPS||29K IOPS|
Whereas the PM863 succeeds the 845DC EVO, the SM863 is here to supersede the high-end PRO version. The 845DC PRO already made the switch to 3D V-NAND, but the SM863 upgrades the NAND from the first generation 24-layer to the latest 32-layer design for increased cost efficiency. I'm suspecting this is the same 86Gbit die that's used in the 850 PRO, but the 2TB 850 PRO appears to use a new 128Gbit die, so at this point I'm unsure about the exact NAND used in the SM863. I'll keep pinging Samsung for an answer, though.
The SM863 actually provides lower random write performance than the 845DC PRO, which is due to the reduced default over-provisioning as the SM863 only has 12% compared to 28% in the 845DC PRO. That said, the over-provisioning is user-configurable (Samsung even mentions that in the press release), so applications that require higher random write performance may increase the over-provisioning for higher performance. Endurance wise the SM863 is rated at about 3.5 DWPD for five years, which is again less than the 845DC PRO's 10 DWPD but additional over-provisioning will increase that.
Due to the more durable MLC V-NAND, the SM863 is mostly aimed for write-intensive applications that includes use cases such as online transaction processing (OLTP) and financial services, whereas the PM863 is targeted at read and mixed IO workloads, such as media streaming. Both feature tantalum capacitors for full power loss protection and support end-to-end data protection. The pricing of both drives seems fairly competitive because the PM863 only carries a ~10% premium over the 850 PRO, and the SM863 carries another 10% premium over the PM863. We look forward to getting the new drives in for review and putting them through our new 2015 Enterprise SSD Suite, so stay tuned!
Post Your CommentPlease log in or sign up to comment.
View All Comments
darkfalz - Monday, July 20, 2015 - linkFinally, a 4 TB SSD! Oh, it's $2200...
Ian Cutress - Monday, July 20, 2015 - link-> enterprise
willis936 - Monday, July 20, 2015 - link-> sata
Shadow7037932 - Monday, July 20, 2015 - linkYeah, that was a little odd to me. But I guess bunch of the Samsung's OEM customers wanted SATA over SAS due to cost.
dark4181 - Tuesday, July 21, 2015 - linkThey couldn't have thrown in NVMe support? Ugh.
extide - Tuesday, July 21, 2015 - linkSATA doesnt support NVMe...
nandnandnand - Monday, July 20, 2015 - linkThat's cheap even before they call it an enterprise drive.
Can't wait for SSDs to hit $0.20/GB though.
DanNeely - Monday, July 20, 2015 - linkProbably going to be a few more years before 3.5" HDD capacity equivalent SSDs trickle down to consumer affordable price points. While I did recently see a breathless article claiming that SSDs would overtake HDDs in price/GB by the end of 2016; I strongly suspect that the author was only looking at trends in smaller 2.5" laptop HDDs and ignoring that 1TB 5400 RPM models are only rounding error more expensive than 250/500 GB HDDs; never mind the prices on large HDDs uses in NASes and SANs.
Impulses - Monday, July 20, 2015 - linkStill takes $660+ (during a sale) and two drives to get 2TB worth of SSD space, vs $75 for a 2TB WD green. Yeah, it's gonna be a while before there's any parity, even relative parity.
If you look at it from a mobile/upgrade option angle it's gonna be even worse, most OEM seem to charge $100+ to go from like a 128GB to a 256GB...
Not that I'm complaining, just got my first 1TB 850 EVO, probably get a second one before year's end if they get any cheaper, along with a 256GB SM951... That ought to work for a while.
Kjella - Monday, July 20, 2015 - linkUhh whut? Above you can see ~2TB SSD drives, listed at $1100/$1260. Agreed there's no parity, but if I need a little space I want an SSD and lots of space than SSD + HDD, whether it's internal or external. Just for storing TBs of video/photo/audio any USB/FW/eSata disk would do the job.