Overclocking Ryzen 3000

Experience with the ASRock B550 Taichi

It's no secret that AMD's Ryzen 3000 processors run hot on basic air cooling thanks to the highly-dense cores packaged onto its 7 nm chiplets. For our testbed Ryzen 7 3700X processor with 8-cores and 16-threads, the key to unlocking the extra performance available with Ryzen 3000 is down to the cooling, with custom water cooling and good quality AIO coolers handling AMD's Precision Boost Overdrive a little better. Another way to squeeze out extra system performance is via the memory, although Ryzen 3000 works optimally with DDR4-3600, with an Infinity Fabric or FCLK clock speed of 1800 MHz. This is what most Ryzen 3000 silicon can manage without instability issues.

Using the ASRock B550 Taichi's firmware to overclock our Ryzen 7 3700X processor was straight forward. All of the boards overclocking settings are within the OC Tweaker setting and includes everything needed to overclock both the CPU and memory. Under the CPU frequency and Voltage (VID) change option, users can dial in a ratio in 100 MHz increments, eg 4.3 for 4.30 GHz. Underneath this is the option to change the CPU core frequency, although we find it best to remain under 1.45 V for the longevity of the silicon. The range of CPU core voltage also relies on the cooling method used, with better cooling allowing for sustained performance without the risk of thermally throttling the CPU cores. 

Other important options include a dedicated section for customizing memory latencies, with extensive options available. For users looking to overclock memory to its rated specifications via X.M.P 2.0 profiles, they can simply select the relevant profile, although some memory kits sometimes come with more than one profile. Setting the Infinity Fabric Frequency is equally important, which we recommend stays below 1800 MHz and it works best at half the memory speed, eg, 1800 MHz on the FCLK for DDR4-3600, and 1600 MHz for DDR4-3200.

Overclocking Methodology

Our standard overclocking methodology is as follows. We select the automatic overclock options and test for stability with POV-Ray and OCCT to simulate high-end workloads. These stability tests aim to catch any immediate causes for memory or CPU errors.

For manual overclocks, based on the information gathered from the previous testing, starts off at a nominal voltage and CPU multiplier, and the multiplier is increased until the stability tests are failed. The CPU voltage is increased gradually until the stability tests are passed, and the process repeated until the motherboard reduces the multiplier automatically (due to safety protocol) or the CPU temperature reaches a stupidly high level (105ºC+). Our testbed is not in a case, which should push overclocks higher with fresher (cooler) air.

We overclock with the Ryzen 7 3700X, for consistency with our previous overclocking tests.

Overclocking Results

Performing our usual method of overclocking shows the ASRock B550 Taichi is a very capable motherboard for users looking to capitalize on AMD's unlocked AM4 series models such as B550 and X570. The default settings include AMD's Precision Boost Overdrive active so users are getting the best-case scenario without factoring in memory. The maximum stable overclock we managed to achieve with our Ryzen 7 3700X processor was 4.3 GHz at 1.350 V on the CPU VCore. This is equal to the best overclock we have managed on any AM4 model tested so far.

Overclocking manually from 3.8 to 4.3 GHz, we saw a gradual and expected increase in POV-Ray performance, with an equally expected increase in temperature as we increased the CPU VCore voltage. In regards to CPU Vcore voltage set manually in the firmware in comparison to CPU VCore under load, we found the B550 Taichi to have solid VDroop control with the Load-Line Calibration or LLC settings left at default. One benefit to the ASRock firmware is that it would under volt slightly which should slightly reduce temperature and power consumption, although the difference is marginal at best. We did try and achieve a maximum overclock of 4.4 GHz with 1.50 VCore to see if it would run, but this was unstable and is down to a limit of our silicon as opposed to the board itself.

Gaming Performance Power Delivery Thermal Analysis
Comments Locked

61 Comments

View All Comments

  • Marlin1975 - Friday, August 21, 2020 - link

    But why? Just get a x570 board with more features.
    The b550 is supposed to be a cheaper board to the x570s.
  • 29a - Friday, August 21, 2020 - link

    I ask the same thing, why? Why didn't they just use the 570?
  • peevee - Monday, August 24, 2020 - link

    $300 board, why? I have bought $50 boards, and it was at the time when north bridge was still on a separate chip. Admittedly, my last build is from 2011... with 2600k... still works, only Ethernet has died (and was replaced with a cheap card, as it should have been).
  • Samus - Friday, August 28, 2020 - link

    Premium boards generally do pay off. Every premium board I've purchased lasted over a decade with 0 issues. Every cheap board I bought had at least 1 issue within a few years.

    Example: Asus P6X58D ($300 in 2008, retired LAST YEAR)
    Example Asrock H87M-ITX ($120 in 2013, the cheapest H87 ITX board, retired 3 years later when it wouldn't POST half the time during a reboot\cold boot)
  • Gigaplex - Tuesday, August 25, 2020 - link

    Where I live, the Gigabyte B550I Aorus Pro AX is 20% cheaper than the Gigabyte X570 I Pro Wifi, and includes 2.5Gbit ethernet which the X570 doesn't have. It's a no-brainer for me, B550 it is.
  • desii - Friday, August 21, 2020 - link

    >why?

    Chipset fan.
  • bananaforscale - Saturday, August 22, 2020 - link

    Chipset fan, that
    1) doesn't even come on unless required and
    2) is required only if you stress test PCIe 4 drives.

    The fan is not an issue.
  • WaltC - Saturday, August 22, 2020 - link

    Doesn't make any noise, either...;) The chipset fan nonsense has always been a red herring, imo.
  • Spunjji - Monday, August 24, 2020 - link

    I understood the trepidation from some people, but it's clear that most of it was FUD from Intel stans.
  • TheinsanegamerN - Tuesday, August 25, 2020 - link

    Not really nonsense when it's been demonstrated that 570 can easily be cooled by passive heatsinks and there is a very good reason people loathe those tiny fans. Tiny fans didnt become super reliable overnight.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now