ASRock B550 Taichi Review: The $300 B550 Motherboard with Chutzpah
by Gavin Bonshor on August 21, 2020 3:30 PM EST- Posted in
- Motherboards
- AMD
- ASRock
- Taichi
- AM4
- Ryzen 3000
- Ryzen 3700X
- Ryzen 4000
- B550
- B550 Taichi
Board Features
The ASRock B550 Taichi is an ATX motherboard that is based on AMD's AM4 socket and positions itself as one of the most premium B550 models on the market. It uses a Ryzen 3000 processor to provide its PCIe 4.0 capabilities via the top full-length PCIe 4.0 x16 slot, a PCIe 4.0 x8 slot, and the top PCIe 4.0 x4 M.2 slot. The Taichi's other slots include a full-length PCIe 3.0 x4 and two PCIe 3.0 x1 slots. Located at the bottom of the board is a single PCIe 3.0 x4 M.2 slot, with plenty of SATA ports with a combined total of eight. Four of the SATA ports are driven by the chipset and support RAID 0, 1, and 10 arrays, while the other four SATA ports are controlled by an ASMedia ASM1061 SATA controller. The Taichi also has solid memory capability with support for up to DDR4-5000 memory, with a maximum capacity of up to 128 GB across four memory slots.
ASRock B550 Taichi ATX Motherboard | |||
Warranty Period | 3 Years | ||
Product Page | Link | ||
Price | $300 | ||
Size | ATX | ||
CPU Interface | AM4 | ||
Chipset | AMD B550 | ||
Memory Slots (DDR4) | Four DDR4 Supporting 128 GB Dual Channel Up to DDR4-5000 |
||
Video Outputs | 1 x HDMI 2.1 1 x DisplayPort 1.4 |
||
Network Connectivity | Intel I225-V 2.5 GbE Intel AX201 Wi-Fi 6 |
||
Onboard Audio | Realtek ALC1220 TI NE5532 Amplifier (Front panel) |
||
PCIe Slots for Graphics (from CPU) | 1 x PCIe 4.0 x16 1 x PCIe 4.0 x8 |
||
PCIe Slots for Other (from PCH) | 1 x PCIe 3.0 x4 2 x PCIe 3.0 x1 |
||
Onboard SATA | Four, RAID 0/1/10 (B550) Four (ASMedia) |
||
Onboard M.2 | 1 x PCIe 4.0 x4 1 x PCIe 3.0 x4 |
||
USB 3.1 (10 Gbps) | 1 x Type-A Rear Panel 1 x Type-C Rear Panel 1 x Type-C Front Panel (ASMedia) |
||
USB 3.0 (5 Gbps) | 4 x Type-A Rear Panel 1 x Type-A Header (2 x ports) |
||
USB 2.0 | 2 x Type-A Rear Panel 2 x Type-A Header (4 x ports) |
||
Power Connectors | 1 x 24-pin ATX 2 x 8pin CPU |
||
Fan Headers | 1 x CPU (4-pin) 1 x CPU/Water Pump (4-pin) 5 x System (4-pin) |
||
IO Panel | 4 x USB 3.1 G1 Type-A 1 x USB 3.1 G2 Type-A 1 x USB 3.1 G2 Type-C 2 x USB 2.0 Type-A 1 x Network RJ45 2.5 G (Intel) 5 x 3.5mm Audio Jacks (Realtek) 1 x S/PDIF Output (Realtek) 2 x Intel AX201 Antenna Ports 1 x USB BIOS Flashback Button 1 x Clear CMOS Button 1 x DisplayPort 1.4 Output 1 x HDMI 2.1 Output |
The ASRock B550 Taichi has a premium networking selection that consists of an Intel I225-V 2.5 GbE Ethernet controller and an Intel AX201 Wi-Fi 6 interface which also supports BT 5.1 devices. Also located on the rear panel is one USB 3.2 G2 Type-C, one USB 3.2 G2 Type-A, four USB 3.2 G1 Type-A, and two USB 2.0 ports. Users looking for more USB connectivity can make use of the front panel headers with a single USB 3.2 G2 Type-C, two USB 3.2 G1 Type-A ports which allow for four ports, and two USB 2.0 headers which adds a further four USB 2.0 ports.
Test Bed
As per our testing policy, we take a high-end CPU suitable for the motherboard that was released during the socket’s initial launch and equip the system with a suitable amount of memory running at the processor maximum supported frequency. This is also typically run at JEDEC subtimings where possible. It is noted that some users are not keen on this policy, stating that sometimes the maximum supported frequency is quite low, or faster memory is available at a similar price, or that the JEDEC speeds can be prohibitive for performance. While these comments make sense, ultimately very few users apply memory profiles (either XMP or other) as they require interaction with the BIOS, and most users will fall back on JEDEC supported speeds - this includes home users as well as industry who might want to shave off a cent or two from the cost or stay within the margins set by the manufacturer. Where possible, we will extend out testing to include faster memory modules either at the same time as the review or a later date.
While we have been able to measure audio performance from previous Z370 motherboards, the task has been made even harder with the roll-out of the Z390 chipset and none of the boards tested so far has played ball. It seems all USB support for Windows 7 is now extinct so until we can find a reliable way of measuring audio performance on Windows 10 or until a workaround can be found, audio testing will have to be done at a later date.
Test Setup | |||
Processor | AMD Ryzen 3700X, 65W, $329 8 Cores, 16 Threads, 3.6 GHz (4.4 GHz Turbo) |
||
Motherboard | ASRock B550 Taichi (BIOS 1.10) | ||
Cooling | ID-Cooling Auraflow 240 mm AIO | ||
Power Supply | Thermaltake Toughpower Grand 1200W Gold PSU | ||
Memory | 2x8GB G.Skill TridentZ DDR4-3200 16-16-16-36 2T | ||
Video Card | ASUS GTX 980 STRIX (1178/1279 Boost) | ||
Hard Drive | Crucial MX300 1TB | ||
Case | Open Benchtable BC1.1 (Silver) | ||
Operating System | Windows 10 1909 |
Readers of our motherboard review section will have noted the trend in modern motherboards to implement a form of MultiCore Enhancement / Acceleration / Turbo (read our report here) on their motherboards. This does several things, including better benchmark results at stock settings (not entirely needed if overclocking is an end-user goal) at the expense of heat and temperature. It also gives, in essence, an automatic overclock which may be against what the user wants. Our testing methodology is ‘out-of-the-box’, with the latest public BIOS installed and XMP enabled, and thus subject to the whims of this feature. It is ultimately up to the motherboard manufacturer to take this risk – and manufacturers taking risks in the setup is something they do on every product (think C-state settings, USB priority, DPC Latency / monitoring priority, overriding memory sub-timings at JEDEC). Processor speed change is part of that risk, and ultimately if no overclocking is planned, some motherboards will affect how fast that shiny new processor goes and can be an important factor in the system build.
61 Comments
View All Comments
Marlin1975 - Friday, August 21, 2020 - link
But why? Just get a x570 board with more features.The b550 is supposed to be a cheaper board to the x570s.
29a - Friday, August 21, 2020 - link
I ask the same thing, why? Why didn't they just use the 570?peevee - Monday, August 24, 2020 - link
$300 board, why? I have bought $50 boards, and it was at the time when north bridge was still on a separate chip. Admittedly, my last build is from 2011... with 2600k... still works, only Ethernet has died (and was replaced with a cheap card, as it should have been).Samus - Friday, August 28, 2020 - link
Premium boards generally do pay off. Every premium board I've purchased lasted over a decade with 0 issues. Every cheap board I bought had at least 1 issue within a few years.Example: Asus P6X58D ($300 in 2008, retired LAST YEAR)
Example Asrock H87M-ITX ($120 in 2013, the cheapest H87 ITX board, retired 3 years later when it wouldn't POST half the time during a reboot\cold boot)
Gigaplex - Tuesday, August 25, 2020 - link
Where I live, the Gigabyte B550I Aorus Pro AX is 20% cheaper than the Gigabyte X570 I Pro Wifi, and includes 2.5Gbit ethernet which the X570 doesn't have. It's a no-brainer for me, B550 it is.desii - Friday, August 21, 2020 - link
>why?Chipset fan.
bananaforscale - Saturday, August 22, 2020 - link
Chipset fan, that1) doesn't even come on unless required and
2) is required only if you stress test PCIe 4 drives.
The fan is not an issue.
WaltC - Saturday, August 22, 2020 - link
Doesn't make any noise, either...;) The chipset fan nonsense has always been a red herring, imo.Spunjji - Monday, August 24, 2020 - link
I understood the trepidation from some people, but it's clear that most of it was FUD from Intel stans.TheinsanegamerN - Tuesday, August 25, 2020 - link
Not really nonsense when it's been demonstrated that 570 can easily be cooled by passive heatsinks and there is a very good reason people loathe those tiny fans. Tiny fans didnt become super reliable overnight.