HTPC Credentials - Display Outputs Capabilities

The XPC slim DH370 comes with 3 display outputs, and their characteristics are summarized in the table below. From a HTPC use-case perspective, the entries of interest include the ability to support UHD (3840 x 2160) or higher resolutions, along with HDR and HDCP 2.2. The latter enables the display output to be used for viewing protected content such as 4K Netflix streams and play back UltraHD Blu-rays.

Shuttle XPC slim DH370 Display Outputs
  HDMI DisplayPort 1 DisplayPort 2
Version 2.0a 1.2
Max. Video Output 3840x2160 @ 60Hz 4096x2160 @ 60Hz
HDCP Yes (2.2)
HDR Yes
HD Audio Bitstreaming Yes

The system allows all three display outputs to be simultaneously active at the maximum rated resolutions. To maintain uniformity, we tested all three outputs driving a 3840 x 2160 display at 59.94 Hz in 'extension' mode.

The system has no trouble running three 4Kp60 displays and doing casual browsing or animation displays on all three at the same time. We will be analyzing more interesting use-cases in a later section.

Supporting the display of high-resolution protected video content is a requirement for even a casual HTPC user. In addition, HTPC enthusiasts also want their systems to support refresh rates that either match or be an integral multiple of the frame rate of the video being displayed. Most displays / AVRs are able to transmit the supported refresh rates to the PC using the EDID metadata. In some cases, the desired refresh rate might be missing in the list of supported modes.

Custom Resolutions

Our evaluation of the Shuttle XPC slim DH370 as a HTPC was done using the native HDMI output connected to a TCL 55P607 4K HDR TV via a Denon AVR-X3400H AV receiver. We also performed additional testing after connecting one of the DisplayPort outputs to a LG 34WK95U 5K monitor.

Various display refresh rates ranging from 23.976 Hz to 59.94 Hz were tested. Of particular interest is the 23.976 Hz (23p) setting, which Intel used to have trouble with in the pre-Broadwell days.

The gallery below presents screenshots from the other refresh rates that were tested.

The system has no trouble maintaining a fairly accurate refresh rate throughout the duration of the video playback.

High Dynamic Range (HDR) Support

The ability of the system to support HDR output is brought out in the first line of the madVR OSD in the above pictures. The display / desktop was configured to be in HDR mode prior to the gathering of the above screenshots.

The ideal desktop experience needs a YCbCr 4:4:4 or RGB output in order to avoid chroma subsampling artifacts on text content in HDR mode. The Shuttle XPC slim DH370 has no issues with this aspect.

The CyberLink Ultra HD Blu-ray Advisor tool confirms that our setup (Shuttle XPC slim DH370 + Denon AVR-X3400H + TCL 55P607) supports HDCP 2.2 along with HDR. The PC also satisfies other requirements (such as SGX and appropriate Management Engine firmware) to enable playback of Ultra HD Blu-rays.

In fact, we were able to activate UHD Blu-ray playback on our standard HTPC setup, as well as the LG HDR 5K monitor driven using one of the DisplayPort outputs.

Miscellaneous Performance Metrics - II HTPC Credentials - YouTube and Netflix Streaming
Comments Locked

37 Comments

View All Comments

  • NaterGator - Monday, May 6, 2019 - link

    Now this looks like one heck of a routerbox. If only it had 10GBase-T...
  • fusebokme - Monday, May 6, 2019 - link

    I have this box (the XH version) running pfsense on a Pentium Gold G5600. Multiple openvpn connections don't stress it at all. Got G5600 due to high single thread performance (pppoe and openvpn are single threaded). Excellent box. Very stable. Intel NICs. As you say: 10gbit would be icing on the cake but not too many places you can get 10gbit internet yet.
  • JHBoricua - Monday, May 6, 2019 - link

    Why? Way too expensive for that purpose, specially when you're limited to two interfaces. A HP T620 Plus with 8GB RAM and 16GB of storage plus a quad port intel i340 card can be built for half of what this costs as a barebones kit.
  • 0ldman79 - Tuesday, May 7, 2019 - link

    If you're doing traffic shaping, sure.

    If you're just moving data it's massively overkill.
  • bill.rookard - Tuesday, May 7, 2019 - link

    I have a SuperMicro itx board with an Atom D525 and dual NICs for my pfsense box - super quiet, and solid as a rock. Fraction of the price of this unit.

    (and no, there are no backdoor chips as far as I can see LOL)
  • GreenReaper - Tuesday, May 7, 2019 - link

    Other than the Intel? Its PVAP (Protected Audio Visual Path) will remain:
    https://forums.freebsd.org/threads/remote-code-exe...

    You might be able to use me_cleaner:
    https://github.com/corna/me_cleaner

    Of course, you will lose the ability to decode protected formats in hardware:
    https://www.techarp.com/bios-guide/pavp-mode/

    It may be paranoia to imagine that Intel has deliberately back-doored their decoder, but perhaps less so to imagine that there may be an exploitable bug in the code, especially given recent issues.
  • Irata - Wednesday, May 15, 2019 - link

    It seems that Backdoor chips won't be needed.
  • Hixbot - Monday, May 6, 2019 - link

    Another small pc review with no noise measurements...
  • mikato - Monday, May 6, 2019 - link

    He has a couple sentences with some subjective noise analysis that was very helpful to me at least. "simply too noisy for use as a HTPC"
  • Hixbot - Tuesday, May 7, 2019 - link

    All of Ganesh's small pc reviews need objective noise measurements. It's one of the most important aspects of a HTPC. Temperature measurements are not much help if they can't be compared to noise levels.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now