The 2014 Razer Blade Review
by Brett Howse on October 10, 2014 9:00 AM EST- Posted in
- Notebooks
- Gaming
- Laptops
- Razer Blade

Introduction
Razer moved from being a peripheral maker to a system builder in 2012, with the original Razer Blade. Since then, they have evolved and tweaked their gaming laptop systems several times. While the original Blade was a 17 inch gaming laptop, later on a 14 inch model was introduced that caused a rename of the 17 inch model to the Razer Blade Pro. These two devices are still the only two laptops available from Razer, and in 2014 the Razer Blade got another refresh with the New Razer Blade being released in April of this year. The significant updates over the 2013 model are the display, moving from a (rather poor) 1600x900 panel to a 3200x1800 QHD+ IGZO display and an upgraded GPU to push all of the extra pixels they just added. The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 870M replaces the GTX 765M from the 2013 model.
Razer has achieved this update without changing their design philosophy for the Blade. The Blade is a powerful gaming system packed into a thin and (relatively) light form factor. The 2013 chassis and 2014 chassis are nearly identical in size, with the new model only 1mm (0.039”) thicker and 150 grams (0.33 lbs) heavier than the outgoing model despite the significant increase in performance. Here's a breakdown of the old and new Razer Blades:
Razer Blade 14-Inch Specifications | |||||
2013 (Last Model) |
2014 (New Model) |
||||
Processor | Intel Core i7-4702HQ (4x2.2GHz + HTT, Turbo to 3.2GHz, 22nm, 6MB L3, 37W) |
Intel Core i7-4702HQ (4x2.2GHz + HTT, Turbo to 3.2GHz, 22nm, 6MB L3, 37W) |
|||
Chipset | Intel HM87 | Intel HM87 | |||
Memory | 8GB DDR3L-1600 | 8GB DDR3L-1600 | |||
Graphics | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M 2GB GDDR5 768 CUDA cores, 797 MHz/863 MHz core 4 GHz memory 128-bit memory bus Intel HD 4600 Graphics (20 EUs, up to 1.15GHz) |
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 870M 3GB GDDR5 1344 CUDA cores, 941 MHz core 5 GHz memory clocks 192-bit memory bus Intel HD 4600 Graphics (20 EUs, up to 1.15GHz) |
|||
Display | 14" LED Matte 16:9 900p AU Optronics AUO103E |
14" Glossy 16:9 3200x1800 Sharp LQ140Z1JW01 IGZO Multitouch with LED Backlight |
|||
Hard Drive(s) | Samsung PM841 256GB mSATA 6Gbps SSD |
Samsung PM851 128/256/512GB SATA M.2 |
|||
Optical Drive | - | - | |||
Networking | Killer Wireless-N 1202 Dual Band 2x2 802.11a/b/g/n Bluetooth 4.0 |
Intel Wireless-AC 7260HMW Dual Band 2x2:2 802.11a/b/g/n/ac Bluetooth 4.0 |
|||
Audio | Realtek ALC269 HD audio Stereo speakers Combination mic/headphone jack |
Realtek ALC269 HD audio Stereo speakers Combination mic/headphone jack |
|||
Battery | 70Wh | 70Wh | |||
Front Side | - | - | |||
Right Side | USB 3.0 HDMI 1.4a Kensington lock |
USB 3.0 HDMI 1.4a Kensington Lock |
|||
Left Side | AC adapter 2x USB 3.0 Combination mic/headphone jack |
AC adapter 2x USB 3.0 Combination mic/headphone jack |
|||
Back Side | - | - | |||
Operating System | Windows 8 64-bit | Windows 8.1 64-bit | |||
Dimensions | 13.6" x 9.3" x 0.66" 345mm x 235mm x 16.8mm |
13.6" x 9.3 " x 0.70" 345mm x 235mm x 17.9mm |
|||
Weight | 4.1 lbs 1.88 kg |
4.47 lbs 2.03 kg |
|||
Extras | Webcam Killer Networks wireless networking Backlit anti-ghosting keyboard |
2.0 MP Webcam Razer Synapse 2.0 Software 10-point Multitouch Display Backlit anti-ghosting keyboard |
|||
Warranty | 1year limited | 1 year limited | |||
Pricing | $1799 for 128GB | $2200 for 128GB $2400 for 256GB $2700 for 512GB |
With a starting price of $2199 for the 128GB model -- and really, let's just skip the 128GB and go start with the 256GB offering, as there's not much point in a gaming notebook with only 128GB of storage -- the Razer Blade is far from inexpensive, but for the price you can get a gaming laptop that is actually portable. There are certainly less expensive systems around, but few can pack this much power into such a small chassis.
As a comparison, The Alienware 14 inch laptop with a 1080p panel and GTX 765M GPU looks downright portly compared to the Razer Blade, with the Alienware having a 41.7mm (1.64”) thick body and 2.77 kg (6.10 lbs) in weight. In case the numbers don’t make it obvious, the Alienware is 2.3x thicker and 1.37x as heavy for the same 14 inch screen with a less powerful GPU. The Alienware 14 with a 256GB SSD does cost $450 less, but portability is clearly the strength of the Razer Blade. It is not as light as an Ultrabook, but if you need a more powerful system that you can still take with you, this is the laptop to consider.
Looking at the rest of the internals, there is not a lot to complain about if performance is what you are after. The Intel Core i7-4702HQ is the same Haswell quad-core 8-thread 37 watt chip found in the 2013 Razer Blade, and it features a base clock of 2.2 GHz with a maximum Turbo of 3.2 GHz. The only options for storage are all M.2 based SSD drives, with capacities from 128GB to 512GB. The Samsung PM851 found in the Blade is the same OEM version of the 840 EVO as the Surface Pro 3, and has excellent speeds as we will see later in the review.
The wireless card gets an upgrade to an 802.11ac model with the Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7260 model, which is a 2x2:2 card for a maximum connection speed of 867 Mbps. The only real complaint about the Razer Blade is the amount of RAM available. 8GB of DDR3L-1600 is generally enough for most gaming tasks, but for a laptop at this price point it would be nice to see at least an option to add 16GB or more. While the Blade is not a workstation class machine, the CPU inside does support all of the Virtualization options from Intel, but with only 8GB of memory the number of virtual machines you could run on here is pretty limited. One might also consider the ALC269 audio codec as being low on the absolute scale, but in is one of Realtek's highest 2-channel audio solutions with an embedded speaker amplifier.
69 Comments
View All Comments
wrkingclass_hero - Monday, October 13, 2014 - link
He didn't retire. You could say he left, he moved on, he departed, he resigned, he stopped working at Anandtech, he quit, he's following a new career path, he's pursuing other interests, following other pursuits, etc. I realize that you don't want to say that the review was shelved due to conflict of interest because he works at Apple, but you can be discreet without being deceptive.He and Brian are about as retired as Dustin and Vivek.
fabarati - Tuesday, October 14, 2014 - link
Here retired means retired from Anandtech. Perfectly valid language.invinciblegod - Friday, October 10, 2014 - link
So I guess they gave up on the Razer Edge?tipoo - Friday, October 10, 2014 - link
Wowza, didn't know the Surface Pro 3 was that efficient per milliwatt. What magic is going on there? Lower wattage, but doesn't the Yoga Pro 2 also have a ULV?Waveblade - Friday, October 10, 2014 - link
Probably one of the better binned CPUs? Or less turbo boostingtipoo - Friday, October 10, 2014 - link
They perform pretty close I think. Could also be the display panel.Walkop - Saturday, October 11, 2014 - link
It's the display. It's stupidly efficient.Something like 3w. The iPad Air (10") uses 6w. Much bigger yet half the power. Normalized for brightness it's still twice as power efficient.
Flunk - Friday, October 10, 2014 - link
They really rake you over the coals with those storage prices, especially because you have to disassemble it to change the SSD.XabanakFanatik - Friday, October 10, 2014 - link
I can tell you from experience that replacing the SSD in this specific laptop is significantly easier than you think. The bottom must be taken off since it is one piece, and a ribbon cable over the drive must be removed. Takes less than 5 minutes, even with being very careful, to get access to the drive.XabanakFanatik - Friday, October 10, 2014 - link
The issue is the price of M.2 SSD's and the actual offerings for SATA M.2 drives. It was cheaper to buy the 512GB model with the student discount from the microsoft store (10% off) than to buy the 128GB model without discount and replace the drive with a 512GB M550 M.2 drive.