Test Results: Memory Timings & Bandwidth Comparison

Our standard memory tests allowed comparison of OCZ 3500EB to other memory tested at AnandTech, but the charts do not clearly show what is happening with timings and bandwidth with EB memory. Using the same data in a different way illustrates better the impact of Enhanced Bandwidth on performance.

We took a closer look at the test results from six currently available memories that have been top performers in our benchmarks. If you look closely at the memory timings, you will see that while OCZ 3500EB was at CAS 2.5 at DDR400, all the other 5 memories managed CAS 2. By DDR433, the 3500EB was still at CAS 2.5 and the Mushkin BH6, OCZ 3700 Gold Rev.2, and Kingmax DDR500 were still at CAS 2.

Memory Timings
Speed OCZ 3500EB Mushkin 3200 2-2-2 Special OCZ 3700 Rev. 2 Kingmax DDR500 Corsair XMS4000 PRO OCZ 4200EL
400DDR
800FSB
2.5-2-3-5
2.5V
2-2-2-5
2.65V
2-2-3-5
2.65V
2-2-2-5
2.5V
2-3-3-5
2.65V
2-3-3-5
2.55V
433DDR
866FSB
2.5-2-3-5
2.65V
2-2-3-5
2.75V
2-2-3-6
2.65V
2-2-3-6
2.5V
Not Tested Not Tested
466DDR
933FSB
3-2-3-5
2.65V
NA 2.5-3-3-6
2.65V
2.5-2-3-7
2.5V
Not Tested Not Tested
500DDR
1000FSB
3-2-3-5
2.85V
NA 2.5-3-3-7
2.75V
2.5-3-3-7
2.5V
2.5-3-4-6
2.75V
2.5-3-4-6
2.65V
Highest
Speed
3-2-3-6
510 - 2.85V
2-2-3-7
454 - 2.85V
3-3-4-8
520 - 2.85V
3-3-4-8
528 - 2.85V
3-3-4-7
539 - 2.85V
3-3-4-7
560 - 2.85V

Yet, if we look at the bandwidth results from SiSoft Sandra Unbuffered Memory Test, the OCZ 3500EB is neck-and-neck with the CAS 2 Mushkin 3200 and OCZ3700 Gold Rev.2 by the time we reach DDR433. At DDR466 and DDR500, the EB is at CAS 3, while all 5 of the competing top memories are at CAS 2.5. Yet the EB outperforms ALL of the other 5 memories at DDR500 despite requiring the slower CAS 3 timing. It is worth mentioning that RAS Precharge remains at 2, and Ras-to-Cas delay remains at 3, throughout the stable bandwidth of OCZ 3500EB.

Sandra 2004 Unbuffered Bandwidth
Speed OCZ 3500EB Mushkin 3200 2-2-2 Special OCZ 3700 Rev. 2 Kingmax DDR500 Corsair XMS4000 PRO OCZ 4200EL
400DDR 2759 2907 2898 2911 2840 2834
433DDR 3014 3013 3091 3042 - -
454 - 3280 - - - -
466DDR 3229 - 3301 3267 - -
500DDR 3484 - 3443 3365 3297 3371
510 3537 - - - - -
520 - - 3493 - - -
528 - - - 3501 - -
539 - - - - 3551 -
560 - - - - - 3729

Looking at the memory bandwidth patterns, OCZ 3500EB is competitive at DDR400 with faster CAS memory, but it is still outperformed. However, by the time we reach DDR433 to DDR466 range, EB is neck-and-neck with the best memory that we tested. By DDR500, EB is the fastest memory that we have yet tested. It appears that EB gets better and better, the higher the bandwidth. It is also interesting that at its highest speed of DDR510, 3500EB has a greater bandwidth than OCZ 3700 R2 at DDR520, Kingmax DDR500 at DDR528, and is about the same as Corsair XMS4000 PRO at DDR539. It appears, at DDR510, that OCZ 3500EB is showing the same bandwidth we find with the best memory we have tested at about DDR540.

OCZ 3500EB was also designed for maximum compatibility with the wide variety of motherboards and chipsets available for Intel and AMD processors. The board used in our memory test bed is known to be one of the most compatible boards with a wide variety of memory, which is one of the reasons why we use the Asus P4C800-E. However, not all boards are as accommodating of different memory, as we often see in our motherboard memory test section. OCZ tells us that one of the major goals in the design of 3500EB was to provide the widest compatibility with the widest range of motherboards. This includes current Athlon 64 chipsets, some of which have proven to have problems with memory timings on current high-end memory.

Highest Memory Speed Charts Conclusion
Comments Locked

13 Comments

View All Comments

  • Pumpkinierre - Wednesday, April 7, 2004 - link

    Yeah well I have had OCZ platinum 3200 o'clocked to 3500 (2-2-3-7) for 9months now and noticed it slowly degrading. I used to pass Memtest86 at 220MHz with Game Accelerator (GAT) F1 (Abit IC7-G) but now I have to switch off the GAT at 216MHz to successfully run Memtest86. At F1, DDR Voltage is 2.7V otherwise 2.6V. I notice the mem. modules are quite warm (even hot) so maybe I need extra cooling as the DIMMS are out of the normal air circulation at the top of the case. And its been a hot summer.

    It seems crazy that memory modules that are at least 12 months old (BH5/BH6) are still the best performers in the 400 to 433MHz range and even higher (original OCZ3700 gold) given the very fast ascent from 266 to 400 at low latencies. Lets hope these Hynix DDR550 modules cut the mustard.

    I cant run F1 higher than CAS2 at present (and Street Racer not at all) although others in posts say they do. So finally Wesley, will the EB technology modules run F1 or Street Racer at 466-500Mhz.


  • johnsonx - Wednesday, April 7, 2004 - link

    It might have been interesting to set CAS latency on the other modules to 2.5 to see how much this 'EB' helps vs. non-EB ram at identical timings.

    This article also simply seems to show (again) that OCZ memory, of any sort, is just plain good. Recall the article on the FX-53, wherein the 2.4Ghz chip with OCZ ram performed more than 200Mhz better than the 2.2Ghz FX-51 with Mushkin RAM... this even though the Mushkin had better timings.

    Were I shopping for high performance RAM, my shopping would begin and end with OCZ... it'd just be a matter of choosing which OCZ modules.
  • Cybercat - Wednesday, April 7, 2004 - link

    Well....this is new....and impressive.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now