Performance Comparisons

Performance of the Kingmax Hardcore Series DDR500 and DDR466 was compared to all of the memory recently tested in:

New Memory Highs: Corsair and OCZ Introduce DDR550
OCZ PC3700 Gold Rev. 2: The Universal Soldier
OCZ 4200EL: Tops in Memory Performance
Mushkin PC4000 High Performance: DDR500 PLUS
Corsair TwinX1024-4000 PRO: Improving DDR500 Performance
Mushkin & Adata: 2 for the Fast-Timings Lane
Searching for the Memory Holy Grail - Part 2

Memory performance was compared at DDR400, DDR500 and the highest stable overclock that we could achieve and would run Gun Metal 2 Benchmark 2, Quake 3, UT2003, and Super PI to 2MM places. Where the data was available, comparisons were also made at DDR433 and DDR466.

Results are compared for Quake 3, Sandra UNBufferred Memory Test, and Super PI. SiSoft Sandra 2004 reports 2 results for each memory test - an Integer value and a Float value. Results reported in our charts are the result of averaging the INT and FLOAT scores, which are normally close in value. In other words, INT and FLOAT scores were added and divided by 2 for our reported score.

Test Results: Kingmax DDR500 and Kingmax DDR466 DDR400 Charts
Comments Locked

14 Comments

View All Comments

  • Souka - Wednesday, March 10, 2004 - link

    BGA modules have been on Laptop Memory modules for sometime.

    I will say that the BGA's run cooler, which means better battery life. How much? Maybe 10seconds, maybe 10minutes (based on a 4hr battery in my IBM T41)....I just don't have the time to do a fair test.

    My $.02
  • Evan Lieb - Wednesday, March 10, 2004 - link

    We're going at ludicrous speed. ;)
  • PorBleemo - Tuesday, March 9, 2004 - link

    I agree AgaBooga, the AT staff has shifted into 6th gear. :)
  • AgaBooga - Tuesday, March 9, 2004 - link

    Good article, glad to see how fast you guys are crankin out articles :D

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now