Searching for the Memory Holy Grail - Part 2
by Wesley Fink on August 26, 2003 11:11 PM EST- Posted in
- Memory
Geil Platinum 4000
Click the image to view a larger picture.
Geil (pronounced Gale, as in gale-force winds) Platinum series DDR500 comes in the fanciest Dual-Channel kit packaging that we have seen. The matched pair of dual-channel modules is in a slide-top Plexiglas presentation case. Modules are packaged with the high-shine platinum-colored heatspreaders with the high-relief Geil logo. Geil uses blanks that are labeled with a Geil ID on the chips. While we do not have confirmation from Geil, the chips behave like Hynix in their timings and performance — the same chips used by OCZ and Corsair.
Geil was the biggest surprise in this roundup, performing very well at all tested speeds, and coming in at a close 2nd at DDR546 for highest stable overclock.
| Geil Platinum 4000 — 2 x 512 MB Double-Bank | |||||
| Speed | Memory Timings & Voltage | Quake3 fps |
Sandra UNBuffered | Sandra Standard Buffered | Super PI 2M places (time in sec) |
| 400DDR 800FSB |
2.5-3-4-5 2.55V |
321.53 | INT 2612 FLT 2646 |
INT 4701 FLT 4710 |
133 |
| 500DDR 1000FSB |
2.5-3-4-6 2.65V |
399.8 | INT 3336 FLT 3348 |
INT 5932 FLT 5890 |
107 |
| 546DDR 1092FSB |
3-4-4-8 2.85V |
429.13 | INT 3439 FLT 3507 |
INT 6469 FLT 6455 |
98 |
Facebook
Twitter
RSS
77 Comments
View All Comments
Anonymous User - Wednesday, August 27, 2003 - link
Okay... So I have the kingston ram, and I pulled it out to take a look at it... it has 4 chips on each side.. does that make it double sided or does that mean it's a single sided like the one in this article?Wesley Fink - Wednesday, August 27, 2003 - link
#2 -As I said in the review "You will have to decide if the increases in performance from using faster memory are worth the cost of that speedier memory. For some, these increases will matter a great deal, while for others, they will not be worth the cost."
Anonymous User - Wednesday, August 27, 2003 - link
OCZ Rocks :-DAnonymous User - Wednesday, August 27, 2003 - link
#1, get a life, no one likes a blind haters. OCZ has proven themselves, I'm sorry your you feel your geek life has been threatened.Anyway, great review as always Wesley. Keep up the excellent work. :)
AgaBooga - Tuesday, August 26, 2003 - link
I am currently reading the first page and I saw "Quake3 Demo FOUR.dm_66" and since I was first browsing it before reading it, I think it said "Quake FOUR!" But then, I went back since I was scrolling down quickly only to see it was Quack ;) 3, hehe.Anonymous User - Tuesday, August 26, 2003 - link
You have got to be kidding me. You're going to suggest that 6fps(at most) in UT2003 is worth spending double the price on RAM?Anonymous User - Tuesday, August 26, 2003 - link
Well I'm not going to bother reading the article, but I'll take a wild guess and say OCZ was declared the winner.