A Closer Look

We already knew that the Crucial DIMMs using Samsung chips were outstanding performers, but we decided to take a closer look at the DIMMs and their performance.




The Crucial single-sided 256Mb DIMM carries the Samsung label that identifies it as using CB3 chips.




The chip markings are difficult to read in the photograph, but the chip is marked as "K4H560838D-TCB3". A check with Samsung specifications at http://www.samsung.com/Products/Semiconductor/ show that these chips are used in modules of both DDR333 and DDR400 DIMMs. We have seen them used at DDR333 CAS2.5 and DDR400 CAS3.0.
Index Comparing Memory Bandwidth: UNBuffered Memory Performance
Comments Locked

68 Comments

View All Comments

  • Anonymous User - Friday, August 8, 2003 - link

    MS ,
    I think the point of the article was to prove that the lasering process works ? I could be wrong but it appears the results confirm it
  • Anonymous User - Friday, August 8, 2003 - link

    Not a word in this review about OCZ having the worst reputation in the industry? Not a word about them never standing behind their products. Not a word about them closing down their parent company every time the claims and fraud investigations start getting big, and then re-opening again somewhere else a couple of months later.

    Once a criminal enterprise, always a criminal enterprise. OCZ is a fraud, no matter what special review chips they send to sites like this one.
  • MS - Friday, August 8, 2003 - link

    I removed the top layer from some chips and tested the same DIMM before and after and there was no difference whatsoever. Therefore, I am stil sceptic about the entire issue of going topless for better performance.
  • Mday - Friday, August 8, 2003 - link

    always good to see a place turn around, but there are always lingering doubts...
  • Evan Lieb - Friday, August 8, 2003 - link

    Yeah, they've changed quite a bit Kris. Their product's performance and their customer support today makes them a much more reputable memory contender than they were 1 or 2 years ago.
  • Anonymous User - Friday, August 8, 2003 - link

    Why won't you be including Mushkin, this time?
    You used to be really big on them.
  • KristopherKubicki - Friday, August 8, 2003 - link

    I visted with them a month or two ago, they seem a lot less like the company I visited 18 months ago.
  • AgaBooga - Thursday, August 7, 2003 - link

    I think if OCZ continues this kind of introduction of products they may turn the company around from its past. Also, I liked how they co-operated and gave the chips you guys asked for without trouble. Doing that, they show their confidence in their laser process.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now